Christmas with the Curia

Too busy cooking for our Christmas Eve party to do a full scale Potpourri, but wanted to highlight the Pope's end-of-year remarks to the Curia.  He always takes the occasion to sort of review what he sees as the highlights or main themes of the year. The attack on the family is one of his three priorities and I thought this was beautiful, and so indicative of why we need a Savior who comes to us small and willing to suffer.
the question of the family is not just about a particular social construct, but about man himself – about what he is and what it takes to be authentically human. The challenges involved are manifold. First of all there is the question of the human capacity to make a commitment or to avoid commitment. Can one bind oneself for a lifetime? Does this correspond to man’s nature? Does it not contradict his freedom and the scope of his self-realization? Does man become himself by living for himself alone and only entering into relationships with others when he can break them off again at any time? Is lifelong commitment antithetical to freedom? Is commitment also worth suffering for? Man’s refusal to make any commitment – which is becoming increasingly widespread as a result of a false understanding of freedom and self-realization as well as the desire to escape suffering – means that man remains closed in on himself and keeps his “I” ultimately for himself, without really rising above it. Yet only in self-giving does man find himself, and only by opening himself to the other, to others, to children, to the family, only by letting himself be changed through suffering, does he discover the breadth of his humanity. When such commitment is repudiated, the key figures of human existence likewise vanish: father, mother, child – essential elements of the experience of being human are lost.
RTWT. It's profound, and through a series of steps he concludes with: "Whoever defends God is defending man."

You'll like what he says about inter-religious "dialogue," too. Speaking of the "rule" of dialogue that its aim is understanding, not conversion, the Pope agrees with that but adds:
dialogue does not aim at conversion, but at better mutual understanding – that is correct. But all the same, the search for knowledge and understanding always has to involve drawing closer to the truth. Both sides in this piece-by-piece approach to truth are therefore on the path that leads forward and towards greater commonality, brought about by the oneness of the truth. As far as preserving identity is concerned, it would be too little for the Christian, so to speak, to assert his identity in a such a way that he effectively blocks the path to truth. Then his Christianity would appear as something arbitrary, merely propositional. He would seem not to reckon with the possibility that religion has to do with truth. On the contrary, I would say that the Christian can afford to be supremely confident, yes, fundamentally certain that he can venture freely into the open sea of the truth, without having to fear for his Christian identity. To be sure, we do not possess the truth, the truth possesses us: Christ, who is the truth, has taken us by the hand, and we know that his hand is holding us securely on the path of our quest for knowledge. Being inwardly held by the hand of Christ makes us free and keeps us safe: free – because if we are held by him, we can enter openly and fearlessly into any dialogue; safe – because he does not let go of us, unless we cut ourselves off from him. At one with him, we stand in the light of truth.
I just love that. At first it seems he is offering a corrective to the "Assisi" approach to ecumenism, and he does, but then he goes far deeper, challenging orthodox Christians --whom, I've increasingly come to see, are fear-driven and touchy about everything. I love this intellectually fearless man at the helm of our Church!

Update: 7-year-old Joseph Ratzinger's Christmas wish list. Gosh he was cute.